| HMI-01 | scope | The product identifies users, tasks, hazards, response times, environment, governing standards, and regulator before it adopts the operational profile. | Approved product HMI philosophy and applicability record. | Cross-domain boundary. ISA-101 public series scope. |
|---|
| HMI-02 | type | Frequently read operational alphanumeric glyphs target 16–24 arcminutes, with 20–22 arcminutes preferred. | Measure actual glyph height at maximum intended viewing distance. | NUREG-0700 Rev. 3 §1.3. |
|---|
| HMI-03 | type | Legibility evaluation includes font, luminance, contrast, distance, scale, display, ambient light, vibration or motion, and user correction lenses where applicable. | Target-hardware environmental test matrix. | NUREG-0700 §1.3. FAA AC 25-11B §§5.2.2–5.4. |
|---|
| HMI-04 | type | UI-01 carries frequently read values and controls. UI-02 carries secondary context. UI-03 never solely carries an alarm, unit, limit, mode, or quality state. | DOM role audit and scenario inspection. | Cabrillo Coast translation of NUREG/FAA readability guidance. |
|---|
| HMI-05 | type | Sentence text uses conventional mixed case. Short identifiers and conventional annunciations can use uppercase. | Copy audit. | NUREG-0700 §1.3. FAA AC 25-11B §5.4.2. |
|---|
| HMI-06 | type | The font distinguishes I/l/1/|, O/0/Q, S/5, B/8, Z/2, punctuation, sign, decimal point, and unit symbols at the minimum size. | Confusable-glyph specimen with representative-user recognition test. | NUREG-0700 §1.3. |
|---|
| HMI-07 | type | A fixed-width operational face targets a 0.7–0.9 character width-to-height ratio unless task evidence supports a narrower face. | Rendered glyph measurement and representative recognition comparison. Audited Iosevka Aile ratios are 0.74–0.90. | NUREG-0700 §1.3. Current Iosevka trial remains below target. |
|---|
| HMI-08 | color | Normal operation uses neutral structure. Strong saturated color remains scarce and action-relevant. | Normal-state salience review and grayscale comparison. | Cross-source high-performance synthesis. |
|---|
| HMI-09 | color | Warning red, caution amber or yellow, and advisory treatment remain separate from risk action, selection, live flow, validation, success, and normal state. | Token identity audit and rendered-state inventory. | FAA AC 25.1322-1 §11. FAA AC 25-11B §5.8. |
|---|
| HMI-10 | color | Every consequential color code includes exact text and another cue such as shape, stable position, border, pattern, sound, or haptic output. | Remove color and identify every state. | FAA AC 25-11B §5.8.1. NUREG-0700 §1.5. |
|---|
| HMI-11 | color | An operational view uses no more than six semantic coding colors unless the task analysis justifies more. | Per-view semantic color count. | FAA AC 25-11B §5.8.3. |
|---|
| HMI-12 | color | Distinct meanings do not depend on shades of one color, pure blue for important thin information, or low-luminance color pairs. | Contrast, chromatic-separation, aging-eye, and color-vision review. | FAA AC 25-11B §§5.8.7–5.8.10. |
|---|
| HMI-13 | color | Background and overlaid information remain distinguishable across the supported ambient-light and off-axis-view range. | Photometric and in-context hardware test. | NUREG-0700 §1.5.1. FAA AC 25-11B §5.8.8. |
|---|
| HMI-14 | motion | Operational motion represents observed change, command progress, causal flow, navigation continuity, or justified attention capture. Decorative motion is absent. | Motion inventory with task rationale. | NUREG-0700 §§1.3, 1.5.3. FAA AC 25-11B §§5.9, 5.11.4. |
|---|
| HMI-15 | motion | Critical message text stays steady. A justified flash uses a compact marker or master annunciator, one initial 2 Hz rate, and synchronized master cues. | Rendered timing and area measurement. | NUREG-0700 §1.5.3. FAA AC 25.1322-1 App. 1. |
|---|
| HMI-16 | motion | A user can suppress a persistent attention cue by acknowledgment when continuous cueing is not required. The active condition remains visible. | Acknowledge-state interaction test. | FAA AC 25-11B §5.11.4. FAA AC 25.1322-1 §12. |
|---|
| HMI-17 | motion | Exact digital values normally update no faster than 1 Hz. Trends or changing parameters use 2–5 Hz when rate perception matters. Direct-control rates derive from the control task. | Telemetry cadence audit and task-lag test. | NUREG-0700 §1.3. FAA AC 25-11B §5.9. |
|---|
| HMI-18 | motion | Filtering, hysteresis, damping, and animation do not create misleading lag, conceal hazards, or introduce position error. | Step-response, jitter, and lag test. | FAA AC 25-11B §§5.9.1–5.9.3. |
|---|
| HMI-19 | motion | Reduced-motion mode replaces every consequential moving cue with a steady equivalent and preserves state, priority, source, and action. | Reduced-motion scenario suite. | Cabrillo Coast accessibility translation. |
|---|
| HMI-20 | alarm | Before approval, each alarm defines condition, source, detection logic, setpoint, deadband, delay, priority basis, consequence, response, deadline, clearing rule, owner, and change history. | Alarm rationalization record completeness. | HSE Better alarm handling. EEMUA 191 public scope. |
|---|
| HMI-21 | alarm | Alarm priority derives from urgency of awareness and response and consequence of failure to respond. Status indications are not alarms. | Priority rationale review. | FAA AC 25.1322-1 §8. HSE Better alarm handling Step 1. |
|---|
| HMI-22 | alarm | The state model distinguishes normal, onset-unacknowledged, active-acknowledged, returned-unacknowledged when applicable, cleared, inhibited, shelved, suppressed-by-design, stale or unknown, and failed indication. | State-machine and transition tests. | FAA AC 25.1322-1 §§8–12. Process-alarm lifecycle synthesis. |
|---|
| HMI-23 | alarm | Acknowledgment suppresses an attention cue. It does not resolve, clear, inhibit, or hide an active condition. | Rendered acknowledge test and history check. | FAA AC 25.1322-1 §§9, 12. |
|---|
| HMI-24 | alarm | Multiple alarms retain deterministic urgency and recency ordering without auto-scrolling the item being read out of view. | Mixed-priority and flood interaction test. | FAA AC 25.1322-1 §8. |
|---|
| HMI-25 | alarm | The system minimizes false, nuisance, duplicate, and chattering alarms and identifies initiating conditions without hiding uncertainty. | Flood, chatter, cascade, deadband, and deduplication tests. | FAA AC 25.1322-1 §12. HSE Better alarm handling. |
|---|
| HMI-26 | alarm | An alarm links to the correct procedure, affected system, diagnostic evidence, and retained recall or history when the task requires them. | Alert-to-procedure and recall test. | FAA AC 25.1322-1 §§9–10. |
|---|
| HMI-27 | alarm | Manual inhibit and shelf state remain unmistakably visible with authority, reason, start, expiry, and affected alarm. | Inhibit and expiry scenario test. | FAA AC 25.1322-1 §8(d). Process-alarm synthesis. |
|---|
| HMI-28 | alarm | Alarm behavior defines restart, duplicate event, clock skew, partition, late reconciliation, stale sensor, failed service, and uncertain outcome. | Fault injection and recovery tests. | Cabrillo Coast distributed-system requirement. |
|---|
| HMI-29 | alarm | Alarm additions and changes require an owner, rationale, test evidence, training impact, change control, and post-deployment review. | Governance audit. | HSE Better alarm handling Step 3. EEMUA 191 public scope. |
|---|
| HMI-30 | control | A consequential control shows label, commanded value, actual value, unit, target or safe range, limit, mode, authority, precondition, sample time, and data quality when these affect action. | Control contract and rendered specimen audit. | NUREG-0700 controls/dynamic displays. FAA AC 25-11B consistency and labels. |
|---|
| HMI-31 | control | Selection, armed, engaged, current data, live flow, warning, caution, advisory, validation, destructive action, and disabled state remain distinct. | Complete interaction-state inventory. | FAA AC 25-11B §§5.3, 5.8. Cabrillo Coast state model. |
|---|
| HMI-32 | control | Automation exposes current mode, target, authority source, state transition, constraints, reason for holding or degrading, and manual recovery path. | Mode-transition and automation-surprise scenarios. | FAA AC 25-11B §5.3 and App. F mode awareness. NUREG automation guidance. |
|---|
| HMI-33 | control | A consequential command passes through a typed service that validates identity, authority, current state, limits, freshness, replay, and idempotency and returns acceptance and observed outcome separately. | Service contract, authorization, stale-precondition, retry, and partial-failure tests. | Cabrillo Coast trust boundary. |
|---|
| HMI-34 | control | Confirmation is proportional to consequence and previews the exact target and effect. Generic confirmation does not replace a precise domain verb. | Command-language and consequence review. | Cabrillo Coast action vocabulary. |
|---|
| HMI-35 | control | Known unavailable commands stay visible and explain the constraint when disclosure is safe. Protected capability stays undisclosed. | Disabled and authorization-denial tests. | Cabrillo Coast application profile. |
|---|
| HMI-36 | hierarchy | The overview answers what is abnormal, where it is, how severe it is, whether it is worsening, and what requires action now. | Representative overview detection tasks. | Cross-source high-performance synthesis. |
|---|
| HMI-37 | hierarchy | Overview, subsystem, control detail, and diagnostic evidence use stable spatial mapping and direct navigation. Search remains supplementary. | Navigation-path and context-retention tests. | NUREG display organization. Cabrillo Coast navigation profile. |
|---|
| HMI-38 | hierarchy | A decision value is shown relative to target, safe range, limit, recent trend, unit, time, and quality rather than as an isolated large number. | Operating-envelope component audit. | FAA AC 25-11B Appendix A trend/limit guidance. High-performance synthesis. |
|---|
| HMI-39 | verification | Operational verification covers one warning, mixed priorities, flood, chatter, acknowledged-active, recurrence, inhibit, stale or failed sensor, restart, duplicate event, partition, reduced motion, keyboard, and assistive technology. | Scenario evidence register. | Reviewed alert guidance and Cabrillo Coast failure model. |
|---|
| HMI-40 | verification | Before testing, define populations, tasks, hardware, baselines, and thresholds for detection time, source identification, diagnosis accuracy, correct action, action latency, false action, missed alert, mode error, and recovery time. | Pre-registered human-performance protocol and results. | Testable operational acceptance. |
|---|
| HMI-41 | verification | The product does not claim standards compliance, certification, or safety from visual resemblance or this cross-domain profile. | Claim and release review. | Applicability boundary of every reviewed source. |
|---|